"Because the girl wasn't moving! Double Duh!"
The photographer said she was. Are you contradicting him?
What's the point of your argument here? Everyone has now conceded that while the dancer was moving her arm and the microphone cord with it, the rest of her in the photo was stationary, and this is not an example of photo manipulation. Are you deliberately trying to tarnish the reputation of those who post here at Free Republic? -- Or do you really believe that this is a manipulated photo? If so, file it away in your delusional files with the proof that there was no plane that hit the Pentagon, the Apollo moon landings were fake, the USAF flies alien spacecraft in Area 51, the Loch Ness Monster is real, Bush ordered the New Orleans levees blown up, the World Trade Center was brought down by hidden demolition charges, and that fairies live in a teenage girls' garden in England.