You've got it backwards. There were a very few of us brave souls who DIDN'T think it was the Ramseys and we were constantly posted to with absolute iron-clad insistence that the Ramsey as perp point of view was the only one worth a flip. If you don't know that, you haven't read the thread.
Please don't accuse us outnumbered and outgunned ones of making you some kind of victim.
And it *was* brave. That's a genuine compliment.
I have read the entire thread. I do not believe that *I* have insisted that the Ramseys were guilty to anyone.
I said this on the previous thread:
IMO, but what's the point of endlessly discussing the parents when it is JMK that is the current focus? I am interested in following the current investigation, not the historical witch hunt on the parents, that culminated in nothing a grand jury would even act on.
The parents as perps angle was exhausted years ago. Currently there is a new suspect and I am not in the least interested in rehashing what has been rehashed a million times before to no purpose.
I'm interested in what information is known about the current suspect and what publicly known evidence fits with this arrest.
I've never thought it was the Ramsey's, no matter how much the so called evidence points there. I just cannot imagine someone being insane (and it would take alot of insanity to do to your own child what happened to that little girl) enough to pull that off and be completely normal before and after. Don't buy it at all.