Okay, how about this revision:
Would someone be willing to summarize what we know so far about JMK's possible involvement in this crime? Maybe we could list out what we know so far? We could update as new information comes in. I started a list on the old thread. Here it is again:
1.) We can't determine alibi for JMK
2.) JMK confessed to culpable knowledge of the crime
3.) JMK 'fits the profile'
4.) the DA *must* have more on him
anything else?
It's interesting to look at the connections. All this comes about because of Michael Tracey, a leftie journalism prof at CU. He has been pro-Ramsey and pro-intruder from the beginning. He's produced documentaries (some ridicule as "crockumentaries") trying to finger other suspects, which are riddled with incorrect facts and those he fingered have been shown to be innocent.
Karr happened to run into a friend of Tracey when he was "researching" the JonBenet case. Tracey struck up an e-mail correspondence with Karr that went on for years. The genesis of the DA's looking at Karr for this crime was those e-mails.
Here's the catch. Tracey had been corresponding with Karr for about two years when he produced another documentary accusing someone else of this crime. Only after his latest theory went paws up did he start grooming Karr for the perp role.
Maybe the DA has an ace in the hole, like a DNA match we don't know about. But I'd be very surprised.
1.) JMK alibi is undocumented
2.) JMK confessed to culpable knowledge of the crime
3.) JMK 'fits the profile'
4.) JMK's 1st ex-wife indicates letters signed SBTC
5.) "Shall Be The Conquerer" signature in HS annual
6.) Yes, crazies falsely confess, but real perps also involve themselves in investigations for thrills. It happens both ways. JMK tried to communicate with PR.
7.) the DA *must* have more on him
I think that the arrest affadavit will be unsealed when the DA does or does not charge him and then we will know what the *more* is.