Posted on 08/28/2006 9:01:50 AM PDT by Rte66
DITTO!
No MORE rehash....Just discussion and possible theories on current issue!
1.) JMK alibi is undocumented
2.) JMK confessed to culpable knowledge of the crime
3.) JMK 'fits the profile'
4.) JMK's 1st ex-wife indicates letters signed SBTC
5.) "Shall Be The Conquerer" signature in HS annual
6.) Yes, crazies falsely confess, but real perps also involve themselves in investigations for thrills. It happens both ways. JMK tried to communicate with PR.
7.) the DA *must* have more on him
I think that the arrest affadavit will be unsealed when the DA does or does not charge him and then we will know what the *more* is.
Thanks
Okay, here's what we've got so far:
1.) JMK alibi is undocumented
2.) JMK confessed to culpable knowledge of the crime
3.) JMK 'fits the profile'
4.) JMK's 1st ex-wife indicates letters signed SBTC
5.) "Shall Be The Conquerer" signature in HS annual
6.) Yes, crazies falsely confess, but real perps also involve themselves in investigations for thrills. It happens both ways. JMK tried to communicate with PR.
7.) the DA *must* have more on him
Would anyone challenge that? Add more? I'm sincerely curious how well we can develop this theory and where it might lead us...
This is one of my unsupported speculations.
The actual toxicology report is missing from the autopsy, there is just the two lines on the cover/summary page.
Has anybody ever seen a toxicolgy report on the pineapple in the bowl found in the kitchen?
Is it possible that JBR was drugged and that it was in the pineapple even if not in her blood stream?
I have been suspicious that the summary page was doctored and the actual toxicology report withheld from the media and the public.
The 1st ex wife reports a belief that JMK drugged her, is it possible that JMK also drugged 2nd ex wife and kids?
That's good. I don't know about the toxicology reports on the pineapple. The pineapple had only reached the duodenum so it seems reasonable to say it wasn't yet absorbed when she died. If he poisoned her and something happened 'too' soon, it might not have shown up in a body toxicology report anyway.
Ste66, you now anything about that? Anyone?
Duh, I meant
Rte66, you know anything about that? Anyone?
Unless that can be refuted, I vote to add it as #8 since it could just as well point to an intruder (I might argue that it weighs against PR feeding the pineapple b/c why poison the child when she can just smack her with a flashlight).
The addition would be:
physical evidence that JBR was fed pineapple by an intruder
I've never thought it was the Ramsey's, no matter how much the so called evidence points there. I just cannot imagine someone being insane (and it would take alot of insanity to do to your own child what happened to that little girl) enough to pull that off and be completely normal before and after. Don't buy it at all.
RE blood blisters
"This rupture is usually caused by some form of trauma, such as pinching."
The electric fence charger we have uses small "pinchers" to connect to the wire fence. But the wounds in the picture seem smaller than they are.
OTOH anyone with a pair of plyers and a wire cutter could reconnect smaller clamps. I imagine the result of a automobile battery charger (Mine can regulate the amount of charge) might cause someone to be unconscious. Dealing in automobile the battery charger would be a must for his business.
Spitz said (http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0608/24/ng.01.html)
"DANIEL SPITZ, FORENSIC PATHOLOGIST: Well, when you look at an autopsy report and a toxicology report, you need to realize that toxicology doesn`t look for every single drug that`s out there. It looks for most common drugs. And the possibility of JonBenet being given a drug certainly exists and that that drug wasn`t part of the panel that was done in that toxicology report."
But what we really need to find out is if there was anything found in the pineapple. Was it even tested?
Would appreciate you comments on posts 71 & 72.
Spitz seems to be implying that we may not find any evidence of a drug in the pineapple or in JBR's system, so I'll hold off on adding that as #8 for now.
yes, been there and don't like it. There is more evidence suggesting an intruder did it rather than the family and most of their theories over there are so far fetched. What is sad is if at some point it is proved that someone else did this than the family those people over there will still say trash about the Ramsey's.
Am leaning more toward a charger used to charge up batteries ala automobile. Mine is quite small and could easily have been put in carry on luggage back then.
If the victem is given enough charge to produce unconsciousness I doubt if they'd remember it. Remember the first wife (just) assumed she had been drugged as an explanation of why she was out for two days.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.