[SarahUSC]

The thing that really ticks me off about the Times piece is that they're trying to float the idea that the accuser didn't really change her story. What? The N&O, (who have not generally been friendly to the defense), looked at the same material and found five different stories. Dan Abrahms saw alot of conflicting stories. Numerous blogs have laid out the many stories in great detail. It's been discussed by all the Talking Heads. But the Times thinks it all goes together.

This makes me think the Times was really trying to write a pro-prosecution piece or else they were asleep at the wheel.

[abb]

The DriveBy Media will never admit they were wrong from the start of this hoax...

[muawiyah]

Hold on ~ given the admited use of Flexeril and alcohol, with one of the symptoms being "hallucinations", it's actually to the advantage of the defense that the woman not have changed her story.

It's pretty clear from other evidence that the rape accusation was, in fact, her hallucination! The stumbling around, loss of shoe, etc. is consistent with the side effects of this drug with alcohol.