Replies

She hasn't been certified as nuts, so far as we know. If you know something different, please share the source. Being diagnosed as bi-polar, something we've also seen no proof of, is not remotely close to being certified as nuts. Even if she is bi-polar, so what? Bi-polar people know right from wrong as well as any non-afflicted person does.

The NYT article contained this nifty little restatement of something we've all seen before: "Defense lawyers have also attacked the woman’s credibility. In one court filing, Mr. Seligmann’s lawyer, Mr. Osborn, said evidence of her “mental and emotional problems” would be used to impeach her testimony. Medical records in police files show that doctors had previously diagnosed depression and bipolar disorder."

That was on page 7.

You, personally, may have not seen any evidence of the AV being bipolar, but somebody else apparantly has, and isn't that always the case ~ a day late and a dollar short ~ coulda' won the race, but you were in a different state!

Doggone.

It's possible that the NYT reporter is correct ~ after all, people blab about our most secret and secure intelligence technology to the NYT people, so why not believe them when something in someone's medical records is blabbed to the NYT.

"diagnosed as bipolar, something we've also seen no proof of, is not remotely close to being certified as nuts"

I doubt you know what you're talking about. I have known, very well, two bipolar people. Their life is in no way normal. If they fail to take their medication, they become very uppredicitable. They will sometimes be a danger to them selves. One that I know does not want to take her medication. She will disappear for days at a time and cause so much grief for her family.