But it does suggest that the defense needs to be careful what they reveal about their defense given that Nifong et al seems to be more than willing to fabricate evidence and testimony.
Which raises another chilling thought: Does some of the great analysis here help the defense or Nifong? It is scary how corrupt law enforcement can undermine an open society. Reminds me of Alexander Solzenitsyn's "We never make mistakes".
The facts the AV is diagnosed as bipolar and uses muscle relaxants that can create hallucinations in the presence of alcohol should go a long way toward discrediting 100% of her testimony at trial.
Be it Nifong or any other DA, he or she would be well aware of the deficiencies in the case. DAs analyze evidence and decide whether or not a case should be prosecuted or not based on that analysis on thousands of cases daily in the U.S.. What's different about this case is that it would never have been brought under normal circumstances. But when the elements of a "perfect storm" converge, as they have in this case, an anamoly occurs. The fact that Nifong would not meet with the defense to hear exculpatory evidence speaks volumes about Nifong's immediate determination to prosecute these white boys, come evidence of no crime, hell or high water. The evidence of no crime has already come to Nifong; next in store for him is hell.