Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Swordmaker
Is Windows inherently more vulnerable to malware attacks than OS X?

Microsoft Windows(dos) was designed for one person.
Hence there was never any understanding of a hostile intent to crack the system.

BSD Unix on the other hand was written under contract
from DoD with a mission to defend against hostile attacks in a multi-user environment

Mac OSX was built on a variant of BSD with an additional twenty plus years of understanding of hostile intent.

When I worked at Bell Labs twenty plus years ago there were posters on the walls of cubicles stating :

4.3 > V

Among the world's best Unix programmers, BSD was always considered better than Unix


28 posted on 08/24/2006 7:53:23 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 144:1 Praise be to YHvH, my Rock, who trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: XeniaSt

Berkeley Software Distribution wow man hippies and stuff...


30 posted on 08/24/2006 7:56:36 AM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: XeniaSt
Windows was written before computers were commonly networked to the Internet. And contrary to popular mythology that Microsoft helped the Internet explosion, let's not forget that Microsoft launched MSN as a proprietary network and one needed 3rd party Windows TCP/IP socket software (like Trumpet WinSock) to even connect to TCP/IP networks until Microsoft was dragged kicking and screaming to the conclusion that they couldn't control the Internet and added their own socket support.
34 posted on 08/24/2006 8:22:05 AM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson