Each time a "legalize pot" discussion occurs on FR, the SAME posters who want to get the drug legalized (consistent with legalizing all drugs in the Soros' plan), will bombard the pages of FR with their irrational rants on the benefits of pot laws being repealed.
Ask for help, if you can't understand the posts.
"Speaking" slowly, you're still showing your inability to keep up:
Each time a "legalize pot" discussion occurs on FR, the SAME posters who want to keep the drug war going (consistent with socialistic prohibitions on most everything else, like guns, tobacco & 'sin'), will bombard the pages of FR with their irrational rants on the benefits of criminalizing property, -- in direct opposition to our constitutional rights to life, liberty and property. Why is that? Why do you people claim to be supporters of a free republic, -- yet you advocate unconstitutional prohibitions?
The Constitution does not make murder illegal, either.
Malum Prohibitum - An act which is immoral because it is illegal; not necessarily illegal because it is immoral.
Malum in se - An innately immoral act, regardless of whether it is forbidden by law. Examples include adultery, theft, and murder.
See, e.g. United States v. Bajakajian, 524 U.S. 321 (1998).
Your argument is made of whole cloth.....
"-- The utterly insufferable arrogance of power, and the need for it, is an absolute fact of the human condition.
-- Nothing can be done about it. - Just as the poor shall always be with us, so shall we have these infinitely shrewd imbeciles who live to lay down their version of 'prohibitory law' to others. --"
Just as we have the infinitely shrewd imbeciles who espouse anarchy, at the expense of the rest of society, where no law allows each individual interpretation of what his responsiblities are to society, i.e., Dahmer, Bundy, Manson, etc.
Depends on whose ox is being gored, in all cases of self-indulgent "intellectuals"....