Replies

. . . cannot wait for the "W" apologists and "My President--Right or Wrong" crowd to come up with ways to attack this article.

Here ya' go, I'll start: "articles" usually have examples . . . since this has none, it's more of an opinion-piece.

Ah, exactly what would you call the following, if not an "example," the author's "imagination?"

"The SPP didn’t start out as an idea the presidents of the three nations started kicking around on March 23, 2005 in Waco, Texas, but it became the official policy of the United States at a special summit convened by President Bush and joined by then Mexican President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin."b>

In addition, you know what they say about opinions, right? There just like a**holes, everyone's got one, which I attribute to all those who refuse to EVEN consider the possibility that our President--who whatever faults or virtues he may possess--one CANNOT DISSMIS his desire and support for a North American Union, as false, when considering the fact that he has done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to help secure our borders, and is OPENLY ADVOCATING, amnesty for ALL illegal aliens.

As my pappy used to say, "where there's smoke ......" or if it "walks like a duck, talks like a duck......."

There was talk of this North American Union on talk radio a couple of weeks ago.

A couple of truck drivers called and said they had there trucks inspected and instead of a state sticker the inspectors put a North American Union sticker on the truck. The sticker had three crossed flages, that's right, the U S; Canada and Mexico flags.

It's already started folks.

Here's a quick primer on "examples." If the theme of the piece is "we are losing our sovereignty because of these agreements," then providing an example of the same would be appropriate. Then folks could debate the propriety of the example, instead of attacking the author for his unsupported opinion.

You may complain all you wish about the methods used by this author's (or Corsi's) detractors, but he leaves them no other choice but to respond the way they do. From a rhetorical standpoint, it's comic. This "article" is a virtual "kick me" sign.