Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mase
Interestingly enough, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the question in 2001, I believe. [I'd really like to thank all the protectionist/isolationist True Conservatives on this website, without whose never-ending canards my discovery of this case would have been impossible]. According to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, Fast-Track Authority is constitutional.
102 posted on 08/21/2006 9:45:19 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: 1rudeboy

They dismissed it, they didn't rule that it was constitutional.


104 posted on 08/21/2006 9:51:44 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: 1rudeboy

Nice find. I thought "Fast Track" had to have been challenged at some time during the past 32 years. Unfortunately, I doubt a court decision will deter the "true conservatives" here at FR from continuing to contend that all trade agreements (and treaties for that matter) are unconstitutional.


106 posted on 08/21/2006 10:04:43 AM PDT by Mase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: 1rudeboy

bttt


121 posted on 08/21/2006 4:48:02 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson