I thoroughly understand how many people love a good mystery. But at this point, I personally refuse to speculate as to what evidence the Boulder authorities may or may not have against Mr Karr other than his own statements. At the moment, this whole thing has more than a faint stink of railroading about it. So for me, I'll wait until hard evidence becomes public. Again, he may have done it. I'm just not up for leaping to conclusions.
Point well taken. Wouldn't the fact that prosecutors have relied on these labs for evidence in a process that we now know is tainted be legal grounds for someone to argue that all testing for their case must be done by a third party?
It seems that if I could show the process to be tainted that I would have legal cause to demand an alternate process (private labs other than those implicated and chosen by a third party with a double-blind process?) in order to receive a fair trial?
Just a thought. Yes, I agree that he may get railroaded. What scares me is how deeply the DA and others have put their reputations, careers and public image on the line for this guys arrest. If they're wrong about this guy they're going to take a lot of heat. So, I don't see them backing down from this guy very easily. They're invested in making him hang.