Since Steve Thomas's book is being used to present a case against Patsy Ramsey on these threads, I thought I should post this link.
http://www.angelfire.com/va2/jonbenetpage/
Well, it's really brief but I get the idea. I think you have to separate out Thomas' theory from the forensics. I don't think the forensics necessarily points to Thomas' theory, he just used it to interpret it that way. What I've talked about here is all based on the observations of detectives involved in the case and the pathologists that worked the evidence.
I think that evidence speaks for itself, I just don't think it allows a definitive and clear-cut explanation of all that happened, as Thomas seems to think. It still affords many possibilities but clearly demonstrates that the Ramseys were concealing something crucial and the events of that night were not as they described. What you do with it from there is mostly conjecture.