There was also evidence that the Hi-Tech boot belonged to Burke - he acknowledged as much when he and a friend were questioned about it. John and Patsy denied it beforehand. Most of what people heard about this case was apparently filtered through the MSM so I'm guessing that's why most people haven't heard this. That's why I mentioned in my very first post that some of this info had not been widely circulated but IS public knowledge.
But wouldn't the boot print of a 9-year-old be noticeably smaller than the boot print of an adult male, even one as small as Karr?