According to some of those same pathologists, the asphyxiation actually occured 10 to 45 minutes AFTER the head trauma. That's their finding, not mine.
Where did you hear this?...do you have a link.....this is contrary to what I heard yesterday by pathologists yesterday....
FROM CRADLE TO THE GRAVE
BIZARRE KARR 'GIRL'-CRAZY LONG
BEFORE JONBENET
http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/from_cradle_to_the_grave_nationalnews_philip_recchia.htm
I've heard the same as you, mystery. Do we possibly have "dueling experts" here? And I don't mean on TV, but in official proceedings. I mean there was a Grand Jury that heard the evidence and they did not indict anyone.
Yea, that's the trouble with this case. There is so much disinfo. Supposedly the Boulder police hired several forensic pathologists to look closer at the evidence. They came out with reports that gave more detail about the nature of her wounds. The FBIs Child abduction people also looked at it and said the ransom note was totally bogus and not like "real world" cases.
Crime magazine interviewed a lot of the detectives involved in it and wrote an article. You can read it here:
http://crimemagazine.com/solvingjbr-main.htm
Basically, their first-hand knowledge of the case, and the more detailed work of the pathologists, wasn't publicized much in the MSM.