A couple of additional points that may not have been clear:
There were no other fingerprints found on the bowl.
Also, the bat and flashlight had NO fingerprints on them. How is that?
Why didn't the intruder leave any fingerprints on the note or notepad? Was he wearing gloves through all this, including while he was feeding Jonbenet pineapple?
Pineapple, according the pathologists, was the last thing Jonbenet ate.
Yes, I agree that there is a lot more to this story and I'm reserving judgment until the DNA evidence is sorted out.
Sorry, I'm no expert on the forensics.
If the forensics are as cut and dried against the Ramseys as you indicate, why were they not indicted?
I can't stipulate as to all your forensic facts. Even if true, there can be exculpatory explanations that aren't considered by people whose minds are made up the Ramseys did it, or their son did and they covered up.
Hopefully the Grand Jury did the right thing, because the case was botched and the myriad of circumstances were confusing.