To: ableLight
I think the GJ would have voted for a indictment if the evidence was there. Who knows, if Karr ends up at trail the DA is going to have her hands full. She has to vindicate the Ramseys and prosecute Karr, or whoever stands trail if anyone ever does.
2,297 posted on
08/25/2006 11:03:15 PM PDT by
Conservative Texan Mom
(Some people say I'm stubborn, when it's usually just that I'm right.)
To: Conservative Texan Mom
After reading your post again I see now what you were saying. I guess what makes me skeptical is that, and this is a subtle point, but in our country it's easier to acquit than to convict. If the jury pool were tainted against the Ramseys it would be easier to acquit with a total lack of physical or forensic evidence than if a jury pool were tainted in favor of the Ramseys (RSM) and a conviction were sought. The DA knew this.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson