possible = possibly
All I can say is... it is very possible that Karr has/had connections in Boulder with some non attention seeking child porn pedophile and Karr may have visited him at some point. This non attention seeking child porn pedophile is not going to come out of the woodwork just to verify that Karr was in Boulder at some point due to Karr and this persons common child porn pedophile interests.
Are persons who have an interest in child porn tagged as pedophile? Or are they only tagged as pedophiles after they have sexually touched or assaulted a child?
To: stlnative
As to your question, I think you have to have behaved inappropriately with an actual child to be labeled a pedophile according to law.
I could be wrong though...maybe I'm thinking about being labeled a molestor rather than a pedophile.
That said, child porn would put one high on the suspicion list of tendency toward pedophilia AND molestation. Suppose some child is molested but they don't know the perp. The cops would take a look both at known molestors and at child porn involvement when looking for a break in such a case.
196 posted on
08/20/2006 4:03:32 PM PDT by
txrangerette
("We are fighting al-Qaeda, NOT Aunt Sadie"...Dick Cheney commenting on the wiretaps!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson