Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Halls

who knows. it could be cover.

remember, Henry Lee says neither of these DNA samples have the complete 13 indicators. He describes them as "partial" DNA, so the match (if it exists) is not going to be one of those "1 in 6 billion" results.

to be honest, I think they are going to prosecute this guy just based on his statements and the taped phone calls. I think they are going to put him on trial absent any physical evidence.


1,143 posted on 08/23/2006 3:09:56 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1142 | View Replies ]


To: oceanview

Oh, I don't think so. Mary Lacy is a smart DA, if there is proof this guy wasn't in Boulder in 1996 she isn't going to prosecute him. I think she knows something we don't. Fact is Karr's family has yet to prove he was with them in 1996 and Mary Lacy may know for a fact he was in Boulder in Christmas of 1996. She is not going to prosecute someone she can't get a guitly verdict on, no way!


1,146 posted on 08/23/2006 3:28:06 PM PDT by Halls (I'm a Texan, Christian, Wife, Mother, Singer, Conservative GAL!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson