I'm a little confused by your question...maybe I'm missing something. I am a bit tired this evening. But my point was that science includes many things by definition. One cannot put limitations on science because it doesn't go along with a deeply held belief. It just doesn't work like that and I think you are limiting yourself to alot of fascinatiing observations of another dimension; not to mention many scientific observations that point to a creator. Where is the academic tolerance?
There are limits in science. It's not the be-all end-all. And just because something isn't scientific doesn't make it true.
Don't get so caught up in worldly doings. You might lose sight of what's real and what's illusion.
Oh? Can you specify these?
Where is the academic tolerance?
Where is the academic rigor?