[jennyp]

It's anecdotal, secondhand. I don't have documentation, but it seems to fit with the well-known inaccuracies of various dating methodolgies.

ROTFL!

[Lexinom]

Yeah it was a pretty funny story. I could have mountains of documentation, however, and it would not matter because evolutionary theory has become dogma, above question.

The story is very possibly true, BTW, but will never be publicized because it doesn't fit the model of what we are "supposed to believe." I could take video of a living dinosaur, get dropping samples, obtain an egg - and it would not change anything. The veracity of the proof is irrelevant.

You may wish to take a stab at the must more serious problem posed in that post, the splitter rather than the easy change-up.