Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman

yes, although the definition of science doesn't say creationism in it, it is obviously part of the scientific field. Please read the defintion more open minded. You guys cannot redefine a word because you disagree with what it includes. Come on now...And the many creation scientists that are very much in this debate certainly are very real.


458 posted on 08/20/2006 7:47:35 PM PDT by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies ]


To: fabian

How can creationism be falsified?

Remember, if it's science, it can be falsified.


465 posted on 08/20/2006 8:08:52 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies ]

To: fabian
yes, although the definition of science doesn't say creationism in it, it is obviously part of the scientific field. Please read the defintion more open minded. You guys cannot redefine a word because you disagree with what it includes. Come on now...And the many creation scientists that are very much in this debate certainly are very real.

You claimed the definition of "science" includes "creation" and I provided a link to 29 definitions on the web, none of which included either "creation" or "creationism" (google "define:science").

I am not redefining a word because I disagree with what it includes. You clearly are trying to do so.

By the way, creation "scientists" are not scientists because they do not follow the scientific method. They are apologists (defenders of religion).

466 posted on 08/20/2006 8:10:02 PM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson