[NonZeroSum]

Evolution says nothing about "superior races." One has to have a warped misinterpretation of it to believe that.

[RaceBannon]

Evolution says SURVIVASL of the FITTEST, and that means superior, does it not?

Even famous evolutionist Henry Fairfield Osbourne said that black adult males had the brains of 12 year old white males and that defended his racist views.

You must not be up on just what evolution means.

[MBB1984]

If you truly believe in evolution, it would be logical that some races or ethnic groups would be superior to others in certain ways, especially in intelligence. This is particularly so after a million years or so have passed by since man allegedly evolved.

However, a mere belief in superiority of certain groups or races is far different than what Hitler did in advocating murder of allegedly "inferior" types.

[ChessExpert]

Evolution says nothing about "superior races."

The alternate title of Darwin’s most famous book is:
The Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life

Adolph could have used that for the title of a book!

[cookcounty]

"Evolution says nothing about "superior races." One has to have a warped misinterpretation of it to believe that."

....so the human race does not not have superior intelligence to the races of bivalves? And since, as has been argued on these threads ad nauseum, there is no real distinction between "macro" and "micro" evolution, where does that leave us? How is it that through evolution, all the races of human kind turn out to be ........exactly even? What are the odds of that?