Since the prof the alleged perp was corresponding with was a big Ramsey supporter, I'd be very careful about this 'til the DNA comes in.
If you go and read his history over in Alabama...the two marriages...one to a 13 year old girl and one to a 16 year old girl...the whole thing starts to look bogus. The guy is a nut for young girls...no argument...and he was in Thailand for reasons that obvious. But this entire story is falling apart and I just can't believe anything unless DNA comes out proving it.
Yes, the DNA will be the tie-breaker. Until that report is in, this is all just speculation about an obvious whack-job pervert.
I totally agree.
**Those details were known only to the medical examiner and the investigators probing the December 26, 1996 murder of the six-year-old beauty queen, the law enforcement official said. **
I remember seeing details from the ME's report on the web some time ago, when the Ramsey's were still "under suspicion". Patsy must have known, and for all we know, some of that could have come out in her correspondence with this turd.
Yep. Ten years gives alot of people, alot of time to nonchalantly unload confidential information about a cold case. Many people worked on this case over the years and there's no guarantee that some of the info that was never released to the public wasn't disemminated somehow.
IIRC, some of the original detectives on this case and possibly a former cop or 2 now work for the Ramseys. They would certainly know a lot of stuff not released to the public....
It would help if Greta et al would disclose the fact that some of the experts now commenting on the case are indeed mouthpieces for John Ramsey.