If his story is true, why a rambling ransom note? To cover his tracks? Did he really have enough time to write a 2 1/2 page note? If it was an accident, why not just leave the house? This case has taken so many bizarre twists and turns I am having a hard time believing anything about this case any more.
even as I sit here listening to experts on with John Gibson and his "Allstar panel', I see and hear both here and in other media mixed reporting, there was DNA, there isn't, there were footprints, there aren't.. there is a mention of a Christmas photo of him with his wife in Georgia, well, let's see it already. etc..
We're only a day in to this , we'll see, it's already been 10 years,, maybe this guy has a 'TaxiDriver' state of mind, delusional may be an understatement to describe his mental state.
in feminine handwriting too....
And why not take the body with him? Especially since he left the ransom demand? And I still want to know how he knew the amount of John Ramsey's bonus (same as the ransom amount demanded, $118,000). Lots and lots of things don't add up here.