That was in part of the press conference.
Look, I don't want to get in a long disagreement with you here. I realize the guy could be innocent of this crime. What bothers me is that I think people are jumping down this lady's throat for remaining extremely tight-lipped and are accusing her of backtracking when:
1. She wasn't the one who initially reported anything. This is her first press conference.
2. She's trying not to get herself in a situation where she is accused of purposely going after a person just to go after person if you know what I mean.
#1. I thought the DA said the school was reviewing his resume to hire him; I didn't think she said he'd already been hired. But you could be right. However, I didn't post anything upthread about that, so I'm still not sure why you think I've posted misinformation about this matter.
Can you tell me what misinformation that is so I can stop immediately?
#2. I don't wish to argue with you either, but you have an opinion the family is treating him like a saint and I have an opinion the DA was patting herself on the back and the office is realizing they don't have a terribly good case at this point and their press conference confirmed that in my view.
then why have the press conference? or, simply have the press conference and say "we have a person coming back to the US to face other charges related to crimes against children, that person is making claims to be involved with the JBR case, and we will investigate that".
end of press conference.
I agree and I think ti is wise the DA keeps as quiet as she can. This guy could have been the killer of JonBenet for sure for all we know and if she talks about it, her case could be ruined!