Jezebelle,
(This is MY read ):
She was let our early on Parole. Part of that Parole is to submit to warrantless searches.
Somehow DPD came to search and find a Stolen Item on 6-30-06.
On 07-21-06, a Judge apparently ruled. She was convicted of Possession of Stolen Goods - BUT, she (even with her extensive record) only got two months and she was allowed to serve it concurrently with they rest of the time she faced on the earlier charge (that she violated probation on).
Looks Extra Sweet. 60 days served concurrently with an attrocious record like hers. She truly is a career criminal.
My take anyway.
Let out early on parole for what? The shoplifting three years ago? People don't get state prison time for shoplifting, and you have to have been sentenced to state prison in order to be on parole. Something isn't adding up. If she violated parole by being in possession of stolen goods, and a parole violation was charged, she would have been sent back to prison where terms are at least one year, not 60 days. This information isn't making sense. Or are you talking about probation? Or was she originally charged and convicted of a felony (sometimes shoplift can be charged as burglary, which is a felony)?
Concurrent sentences aren't uncommon, especially if there are young children at home and/or it's a non-violent crime.
More info is needed in order to evaluate what's going on and what really happened.