Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mike Nifong

Imo, as it's written, it is false. Sutton did not respond to Duke ER at 1:22 in reference to a rape. I se no other way to read it, and I've read it all I want to. It's false, imo.

"On March 14, 2006 at approximately 01:22 hours I responded to Duke Emergency Room in reference to a rape."


334 posted on 08/15/2006 12:54:30 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies ]


To: ltc8k6; Mike Nifong

I agree with your interpretation 1:22 is the time SHE responded.

But she probably wrote it wrong, she has no reason to lie.
(I have been guilty of that, also)


338 posted on 08/15/2006 1:00:08 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson