Could this be a pre-emptive strike to shield the FA from criminal prosecution? Could he be throwing the DA office under the bus?...It will be Durham and Duke who will pay in the end. I'm not sure Cash has his "commuinity's" interest at heart. I'm baffled.
Interesting that the headline of the story is "DURHAM CHIEF BACKS DUKE PROBE." And that is the lead of the article too.
Basically this is a story to keep the masses who read the headline and maybe the lead stirred up. Yet later if he wants Michaels can point to this article the he tried to prepare the black community and get the truth out.
I wonder who decided on the headline? I wonder if the editor can change the order of a column or if Michaels wrote the comments of the chief as his lead and burried the truth later in the column?
I don't think anyone will be anxious to press criminal or civil action against a mentally unstable substance abuser. Nifong is the prize here, not CGM.
Could he be throwing the DA office under the bus?
As Bugs Bunny would say - "Ehhhhhhhhhhh... could be."
It will be Durham and Duke who will pay in the end.
Agree.
I'm not sure Cash has his "commuinity's" interest at heart. I'm baffled.
Perhaps he sees who's got the winning hand, and it's not Nifong. He may be trying to shield his community from the fallout.