I've been here for years longer than you have been, and he's right, and you're wrong. So I wouldn't be so quick to sling the newbie slur if I were you.
I think the point of the article is the extreme sexualization of children....
The comment alluding to burkahs (or however they're spelled) is just an outrageous comment going to the other extreme -
Do you really think it's appropriate for little girls to dress like 20 year olds?
"I've been here for years longer than you have been, and he's right, and you're wrong. So I wouldn't be so quick to sling the newbie slur if I were you."
I reread my post. I did not use the term "newbie". So I'm kind of missing how I can be guilty of using a slur that I haven't used. I did use the term "common DU troll", however. So your point is well taken.
I also apologize to Muryan for having used the term.
As for who's opinion is right or wrong, that's the point of engaging in debate, is it not? There isn't much to debate in a sarcastic statement, nor is there much to debate when another poster says that party "A" is right, and party "B" is wrong but offers no further explanation to indicate why. Would you care to expand on your point a bit?
What are you talking about? RKBA's post was in response to a sarcastic comment comparing people who have conservative views about the way children should dress to the Taliban. That's DU-think. You can't believe that's correct.
Oh goodie, I have seniority on you, so I can declare you wrong.