Not a particularly well written article, but it brings up a topic that tends to get swept under the carpet: the widespread sexual exploitation of children.
My personal opinion is that immodest dress in children reflects the underlying values and morals (or lack thereof) of the parents. What end is achieved by allowing a 9 year old to wear a skimpy outfit? What specifically are you trying to facilitate?
Actions often speak louder than words, and I really, really, really don't like the message that parents are sending. Remember, it's the parents who not only allow the clothes to be worn, but who purchase them in the first place.
I agree with you 100%. My daughter and I have had many-a-discussion on what's appropriate and what's not appropriate. I actually end up making a lot of her clothes myself because the stores are slathered in provactive clothing for grade-school girls.
You're absolutely correct!