Shouldn't the "B" sample of been tested in a different, independant lab in an blind testing procedure with several dummy samples thrown in instead of just grabbing his B sample and running through the same people who leaked inaccurate results to the press to demonize him before the B sample was ever tested?
Wait, that would make sense.....
>>
Shouldn't the "B" sample of been tested in a different, independant lab in an blind testing procedure with several dummy samples thrown in instead of just grabbing his B sample and running through the same people who leaked inaccurate results to the press to demonize him before the B sample was ever tested? Excellent point. I'm sure Landis and his bevy of attorneys are looking at the testing procedures and other issues (including, as they've already stated, the leaks from the UCI). Sure, I'd luv to have a conspiracy proven in this case, but I'm highly skeptical that he's innocent.