Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservative Hall of Fame (vanity)
PA Times | 8/4/06 | Dr. Pissant

Posted on 08/04/2006 3:06:23 PM PDT by pissant

As we all know, spending time here on FR, we recognize that there are various opinions about what makes a great conservative or what it means to be a true conservative. But like in Baseball, one does not get to the hall of fame unless enough of the sportsfans and writers think that person deserving after performing great deeds in his career. So here is the place to decide who gets to be in the Conservative Icon Hall of Fame.

I shall kick it off with my unimpeachable list (so don't try impeaching it...lol).

Cheers and happy friday to all.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: zoinks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: MotleyGirl70

She was extremely pleasant and argued for the conservative side very well.


41 posted on 08/04/2006 9:59:40 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NorCalRepub

And Sam Adams really was a brewer. A very noble profession.


42 posted on 08/04/2006 10:00:38 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: pissant
....and pastime.....hee hee
43 posted on 08/04/2006 10:05:37 PM PDT by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: NorCalRepub

Drinking or making?


44 posted on 08/04/2006 10:11:00 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: pissant

...both of course....I have experience in both...but I only do one well.....*drinking*


45 posted on 08/04/2006 10:12:36 PM PDT by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: NorCalRepub

I was getting pretty good at teh making part about 15 years ago. But it was time consuming, and i only had time fr one or the other. I chose wisely.


46 posted on 08/04/2006 10:15:19 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: pissant

All true. I just question the Conservative tag.

:)


47 posted on 08/04/2006 10:32:30 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other peoples money -- M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

Maybe not for his era. I'd be more than happy to live under the scope of gov't he saw fit, versus what politicians today think is proper for the feds to screw around with


48 posted on 08/04/2006 10:35:33 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: pissant

You don't have to trust him any more than I trust WFB today. Just look at the breakthrough he gave to the GOP and conservatism in 1994 and, despite some of his personal failings, the GOP has held the House ever since.

I'm not endorsing him in '08 or anything of the sort, merely acknowledging what he accomplished in the 1980s and 1990s. Remember Bob Michels, the GOP minority leader before Newt? He was as gutless as Trent Lott. Newt got the job and immediately worked to change the way the party behaved in the House and that led to the 1994 sea change we still enjoy today.

Yes, he's been a disappointment ever since impeachment failed. But that doesn't mean he wasn't a principal conservative in the revolution.

One thing is true of all five of these men. The MSM hated and villified all of them (except Buckley whom they most sneered at and ignored). It takes an awfully principled man to stand up to the blistering relentless attacks from the left. All, in their own way, took the arrows for the rest of us because they stood firm, at least for a significant time.


49 posted on 08/04/2006 11:37:07 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (I wish a political party would come along that thinks like I do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan

Yes, Newt has done some very admirable things. But getting played like a yo-yo by Clinton was not one.


50 posted on 08/04/2006 11:39:26 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan; pissant


51 posted on 08/04/2006 11:50:08 PM PDT by MotleyGirl70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MotleyGirl70

It also says alot about her that everyone who knew her was very fond of her, even her adversaries (well, maybe not hillary)

BTW, what the heck are you doing up???


52 posted on 08/04/2006 11:51:50 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: pissant
BTW, what the heck are you doing up???

Check your freepmail and I'll tell ya ;)

53 posted on 08/05/2006 12:33:00 AM PDT by MotleyGirl70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MotleyGirl70

My freepmail is down, you'll jus haveta explain later, since I'm gonna go saw some serious logs.

Adios.


54 posted on 08/05/2006 12:44:18 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I didn't eat yet today so I'm going to make some eggs right now :)

Have a good weekend!


55 posted on 08/05/2006 1:01:41 AM PDT by MotleyGirl70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Not much for an argument here, but i agree with every single name mentioned, including the obvious additions of Rush and Newt -- hey even if you don't agree with EVERY thing newt ever did, he still deserves inclusion into the Hall Of Fame.

In the Music Wing...
Toby Keith -- Angry American
Merle Haggard -- Okie From Muskogie
Ted Nuggent
Anita Bryant -- blackballed from public life, for speaking against gays.

And no one seems to have mentioned the most important woman of the 20th century, and the person who single-handedly torpedoed the Equal Rights Amendment -- Phyllis Schaffly.


56 posted on 08/05/2006 6:12:08 AM PDT by 9999lakes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan

If hillary runs in 08, people will hear of Barbara Olson's work again -- you're right.

OR if her husband, Ted, is nominated for the Supreme Court -- Which would be excellent!


57 posted on 08/05/2006 6:15:52 AM PDT by 9999lakes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Not in the sense that a Conservative sought to preserve the status quo. Hayek recognized that his own theories were revoloutionary for the time period and that the status quo was slipping towards socialism.


58 posted on 08/05/2006 7:19:19 AM PDT by nonliberal (Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Not sure I would go with Marshall. He did a lot of damage.


59 posted on 08/05/2006 7:19:50 AM PDT by nonliberal (Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: 9999lakes
In the music wing...

Rich Ward

60 posted on 08/05/2006 7:30:32 AM PDT by nonliberal (Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson