I'm not a skeptic of global warming. I am a skeptic of the Humans Bad approach to it, since this is a phenomenon that has happened multiple time in earth's history.
But dieback in veg in the fall? Isn't that when it's supposed to die back? Tell me what is different about this dieback than what the normative "should" be?
When you read these type of articles, written from these points of view, it is truly hard to know what the science is actually saying, because these articles are written to push an agenda.
What does the science say? Not what does the politics and beliefs of those who have belief issues say should be what is used to judge these things.
This is a very spun article.
Knitting A Conundrum
Since Sep 14, 2004
I think I've made my point.
The whole web site is satire.
You have been spoofed. The newest article is about a union pay scale for dogs.
I prefer to think of it as well crafted.