Posted on 07/28/2006 11:43:21 PM PDT by HAL9000
Tww Words, MICROSOFT SUCKS!!!
Excuse me, TWO WORDS, MICROSOFT SUCKS!!!
ROTFLOL
I hope the YouTube video did work for you.
THANKS! I didnt see the YouTube link the first time, yes that works fine! :D
pretty funny, but Vista will have at least 40% of the market by 2008. compared to Apples OS X at about 5-6%
I think its funny that we are laughing at Beta software, its not even a "release candidate" yet, this is Windows Vista Beta and MS Office 2007 Beta correct?
Technically, ambient noise does have that effect on speech recognition software. Air conditioner noise, breathing, even background talking can affect recognition.
It is pretty much why speech recognition hasn't gone anywhere commercially. Office ambient noise screws it up. Directional microphones help, butt don't eliminate ambient noise.
I have doubts that the technology will go very far, at least until mathematicians start modeling "context analysis" into the software. Speech recognition in humans is very contextual. We hear what we expect to hear based on context. We project what we expect to hear next, and listen for it. Until the software can start making the necessary linkages to context, common phrases, etc - it will remain temperamental. Oddly enough, we read the same way.
Microsoft blames "ambient noise". Fair enough, I've seen it happen before. But why are they showing this crap to the financial analysts? Is Microsoft trying to drive their stock price down? It's mind-boggling stupidity on Microsoft's part.
Talking to a computer is ridiculous.
True, but you'd figure execs doing a presentation for Wall Street analysts would have:
A. Known this
B. Prepared for this
C. Tested their presentation under the same conditions.
Not really. If speech recognition wasn't so shoddy, it would eventually become yet another way to interact with the user interface.
It would become second nature. It wouldn't replace manual interfaces, but it could complement that interface. But for transcription, it is pretty ridiculous. In the same way that we can read silently faster than we can read aloud, typing silently is faster than voice to text transcription.
Sheesh, just saw the report. The demo was at Microsoft's offices.
If they can't control the presentation environment there..
What's funny, to me, is that twenty years ago I remember reading that voice recognition was just around the corner.
It's a lot harder nut to crack.
A. Known this
B. Prepared for this
C. Tested their presentation under the same conditions.
Absolutely, you'd think that. They probably did run a test with everything except a room full of people, cameras running, and the room's sound system on high enough to be heard over the ambient noise created by a roomful of people with lots of electronics turned on, and the requisite cooling fans.
Speech recognition is very difficult to crack. I'm guessing they'll crack it around the same time they start actually creating real rudimentary A.I.'s.
And HAL should know!
Remember Scotty in Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home ? "Computer ... Com-puuu-terrr..."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.