Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: leilani

Thanks very much for the links. I still remain unconvinced of Landis's guilt. Isn't this the same lab that leaked the results of Armstrong's seven year-old urine tests? They seem to be working in cahoots with L'Equipe to undermine American riders' reputations. And has anyone put together a doping scenario that would explain the specific results of Landis's tests?


156 posted on 08/16/2006 12:44:22 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]


To: Steve_Seattle

That's what both Phil & John are saying (finally)that this lab, by UCI's own investigation re the unauthorized Lance Armstrong urine leak (sorry for the phrasing there,lol)last year, has clearly demonstrated it has an agenda outside of the purview of sample testing which raises so many suspicions.Since he tested clean on the sample after the "dirty" one, it 'could' very well point to lab tampering. That's why Phil says in the interview that the TdF is going to have to go with a double-lab testing scheme in the future - there's just way too much doubt out there about the integrity of this lab.


158 posted on 08/16/2006 12:55:20 PM PDT by leilani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson