The AFP article I posted in #104 included this sentence - "
The laboratory is likely to test the sample between Thursday and Saturday morning, provided Landis agrees to it".
But I thought I saw another article wherein McQuaid said that the UCI had the right under their own rules to request the 'B' test.
So if UCI has the right to request the test, but they can't test it without Landis' permission, what's the point...
If Patrick McQuaid and the UCI think that jumping the gun & performing the second test without Landis's people present
I read that they intended to initiate the second test on their own, somewhere else too this am. I'm completely, utterly mystified. Unless this is just their way of trying to goose the Landis camp? But how could they not know that merely proposing anything like that would reinforce everybody's suspicions about a nefarious agenda? Green Iguana was right upthread. Start all over from scratch, the UCI isn't trustworthy enough to adjudicate a hopscotch game.