To: stand watie
How then can any man claim they were fighting for the south's freedom when they knew that others were being enslaved?
Lincoln, the abolitionist, staked the fate of the nation to free all from slavery, and the southern democrats staked their own fates to maintain slavery. Lincoln won.
Had there been a debate and a vote he still would have won as well, only without the bloodshed.
66 posted on
07/27/2006 8:28:34 PM PDT by
usmcobra
(If we take our political stance from a letter behind a name we lose sight of what is right and wrong)
To: usmcobra
read #65 above. graoanup said it better than i did.
the FACTS are that lincoln, the TYRANT, was a LIAR,an EGOMANIAC & a crooked SHYSTER lawyer, as well as a stone RACIST & an anti-Indian bigot.
there is not enough soap in all the world to wash away his crimes against HUMANITY or the innocent BLOOD from his hands, no matter what the "lincoln MYTH" says.
free dixie,sw
67 posted on
07/27/2006 8:35:16 PM PDT by
stand watie
( Resistance to tyrants is OBEDIENCE to God. -----T.Jefferson)
To: usmcobra
lincoln was interested in only three things:
1. MONEY
2.CONQUEST &
3. MORE POWER.
he did NOT care a DAMN for 'the plight of the slaves",as he SAID, in his own correspondence.
why don't you "get the message" that you are defending an AMORAL, cheap, money-hungry,politician, who was no better than "wee willie klintoon"???
BOTH lincoln & klintoon would do ANYTHING to "get ahead". ANYTHING!
free dixie,sw
69 posted on
07/27/2006 8:59:07 PM PDT by
stand watie
( Resistance to tyrants is OBEDIENCE to God. -----T.Jefferson)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson