Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: groanup
Excellent idea. Since they saw eye to eye on so many other things that should be a walk in the park.

You seem to forget that before the south initiated hostilities there wasn't a whole lot of desire to make them stay. It wouldn't have been hard at all to work out division of property, settlement of debt, access to the Mississippi, and any other areas of possible disagreement. Lincoln may not have liked it but he didn't have a lot of political support to force the issue.

105 posted on 07/28/2006 5:13:20 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
And I call BS on that entire post. Do you seriously believe any of this? Of course it would be convenient for your argument.

Blah, blah..., tiresome. How do you expect this to be the case?

114 posted on 07/28/2006 8:48:50 PM PDT by groanup (The IRS violates the 1st, 4th, 5th and 10th Amendments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur
Lincoln may not have liked it but he didn't have a lot of political support to force the issue.

Well that's all fine and good. But if your life, liberty and property was being threatened by a central power and you felt that that power was going to usurp your property and your slaves who represent part of that property then wouldn't you fight back?

To all lurkers and to all posters, I'm not in any way advocating slavery, I'm just saying that in the 1800's South and the 1800's North, slavery was an accepted thing.

116 posted on 07/28/2006 8:59:27 PM PDT by groanup (The IRS violates the 1st, 4th, 5th and 10th Amendments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson