Replies

I am not sure why you think credentials are necessary to assert the verifiable fact that these pictures were published in the original journal Science with a scale indicating that they are microscopic, and the pictures you are using are the same pictures that have been trimmed in every case to remove the part of the picture that included the scale.

Here are three places where you posted these pictures previously, and in every case, your assertions were rebutted.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/1646185/replies?c=914

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1645332/replies?c=35

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1638408/replies?c=19

If you are, as several FReepers have alleged, the Notorious Mr. Ted Holden, then it appears that not only do you avow several completely ridiculous scientific theories, but you also seem to be less than completely honest.

I am not sure why you think credentials are necessary to assert the verifiable fact that these pictures were published in the original journal Science with a scale indicating that they are microscopic

Alas, as a demonstration on the importance of scale, I wanted to post here the link to the 'Meat or Accident? website--but it seems to exist no more. It was a quiz wherein one had to guess if a given photograph depicted something suitable for the table or should be shipped to emergency. It only worked because there was no indication of scale.

Pity how some neat stuff like that website just disappears.