It would be more courteous to enlighten rather than attempt to patronise me. But your choice.
Then please allow me this attempt to "enlighten" {rant?} without sounding insulting.
To summarize;
Author claims "Darwinian science" is the enemy of leftists.
Post #34- I make light of Arnhart's claim by suggesting a simple observation.
Post #50- You respond by sarcastic sleight-of-hand i.e."That's a great idea! Let's determine what the content of 150 years of modern biology is by taking a poll of the citizenry's bumper stickers!" {Please note that you changed the subject here.}
You continue:
"No where else in the world do Conservatives have the anti-science stance which a small (but rather vocal) group of American social conservatives do. It's a pity, because we are otherwise all natural allies over issues of substance."
And may I point out..: If we are so "small but vocal", How did a few ignorant, anti-science, Bible waving hicks manage to roll the House, the Senate, and the Presidency while simultaneously battling our own party's liberals?
You and others seem to show some disdain for those who are the foundation for the conservative movement in America. We rightfully claim that position. We believe our rights are gifts from God, not government.{Lefties really hate that one.} It was a small group of social Christian conservatives who founded this country. Now I don't claim to know what constitutes a conservative in the "Queen's English", But let me assure you we aren't liked by leftists over here. I don't hear Nancy Pelosi, Howard Dean, or the RINOs wailing over "blue-blood and moderate" republicans, libertarians, or those Reagan democrats.
We may not like "divide and conquer" games, but we know how they are played.