Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: tallhappy
Your "correcting" (as you call it) was false). It was irrational and representative of non-iquiry.

In what way do you believe that I was mistaken?
490 posted on 07/24/2006 8:30:17 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio
In what way do you believe that I was mistaken?

You are mistaken in thinking origin or creation of life is not a topic of research under evolutionary theory. It is irrational to believe this and shows a lack of inquiry (with irrationality coming partly due to making statements without inquiry). It is easy to look at the field (i.e. do inquiry) and see that experiments or articles have tried to address origin of life in the context of evolutionary theory.

On another level, your answer implies that evolution does not entail only natural processes, and therefore you'd be including some sort of supernatural process as a valid aspect of evolutionary research.

Here is the exchange that began this:

Someone: Evolution's core argument is that life was created from raw natural process.

You: The theory of evolution makes no such statement.

What does "the theory of evolution" state?

504 posted on 07/24/2006 10:38:09 AM PDT by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson