[stands2reason]

There is no "ideal order" in evolution, it doesn't have a teleological purpose. It's a mechanism.

[curiosity]

There is no "ideal order" in evolution, it doesn't have a teleological purpose. It's a mechanism.

Yes, that's why I disagree with the article. There's nothing inherently liberal or conservative about evolution. It's just a fact of nature, and I really don't see how this fact supports one political philosophy or another.

[cornelis]

Science doesn't exclude teleology in general and there is some idea of order in the concept of "natural selection" and "survival of the fittest." But see #122.

In any case, so far we have two votes against the article.