Yes. I know the site. But when I used its search engine to find the text of the Qur'anic verses you cut and paste, nothing came up. Now, when I did a global Google search for those same translations, prophetofdoom.net pages were the first of only 45 web pages found with the text of those four citations. The other pages are mostly comments pages at Jihad Media sites (LGF, JihadWatch, etc) and the text is clearly cut and pasted from prophetofdoom.net.
Ah, so they're all wrong and you're right.
Other people share my views.
Talk about chutzpah. You have said you aren't Muslim yourself... You base your better knowledge on what, exactly?
One could ask you the same question.
I don't care one bit if YOU don't respect my viewpoint on Islam. Many here do.
It's a FreeRepublic ... and listening to unhinged, bigotted rants is not a crime.
When you cut and paste from a online reference its all to the good. If anyone who disagrees with you does, they're Dan Rather.
When I cut and paste from a translation of the Qur'an, I will give the translator and/or the source website. When you cut and paste prophetofdoom.net's dubious textual "evidence" -- without bothering to check prophetofdoom.net's botched citations -- without acknowledging the origin, that's intellectually dishonest. And then, when confronted with this fact, you deny it.