Posted on 07/20/2006 2:44:49 PM PDT by abb
"Come get some!"
And here's his pic on Nifong's webpage. http://www.mikenifong.com/districtcourt.php
For those not watching Court TV - Her "Letter" was her original statement to Police that has been on line for like 7 weeks (or whatever).
They just discovered her statement to Police apparently.
I really wonder what they think they're doing to the next Black REAL victim?
Ok. I've got to leave. My turn to stay with my widowed mom this weekend. Won't be back to my comp until sunday. TommyDale has my cellphone # if something big breaks.
See y'all Sunday.
abb...
Last post. Motion just in...
http://www.wral.com/slideshow/9557990/detail.html?qs=1;s=1;p=news&dm=ss&tn=b
And they simply will not give up on that unsupported date rape theory. Jeesh!
From her numerous comments about making more money, it doesn't sound like old Crystal needed a dape rape drug.
I can't understand the "Logic" of the black talking heads (or anyone defending Crystal really) - they overlook so much basic info and grasp and the littlest things.
This guy Bob McNeil from CBS overlooks that Kim says Crystal wants to return to the house because there's still money to be made - at a time when the rape would've already been committed - and he points to the fact that in Kim's statement she says, when they're both in the Bathroom with the door shut and Crystal is upset that Kim stopped the dancing, that Crystal yells to players knocking at the door, leave us alone.
So, Bob McNeil thinks knocking at the door means she was gang-raped?
It's too bad, but when I saw he was black - I knew he was going to support Crystal, despite the fact he's a defense attorney! This thing splits down racial lines like the OJ case, IMO.
Don't know if this has been posted yet, courtesy of Friends of Duke. OMG!!!
http://funkb.us/dada/
I looked for an email for JohninCarolina but could not find one.
Mad-Margaret,
Yeah, I knew where it was going when they went right to the drink and her behavior.
You're right, they'll never let that date-rape thing die - probably because it can't be disproved.
Notice how they NEVER bring up the fact that her IDs would be questionable if she had been drugged. How they NEVER mention that her statements in the 4/4 lineup are of clear, lucid recollections - even remembering little non-important things players said that never touched her (allegedly).
I challenge any of the fools to read the transcript from the 4/4 lineup and say that's a drugged person describing the night's activities.
Thanks maggief !
Have a great weekend !
You too!
Sorry, I could be of help.
They are so grasping at anything that might support Crystal.
I just looked (again!) at the "Come Get Some" site and I can't stop laughing. That boy is such a fool! Heh heh! I wish one of the locals would let us all know the consequences of this little gem on the internet.
Osborn's new motion filed today:
http://www.wral.com/slideshow/9557990/detail.html?qs=;s=1;p=news;dm=ss;w=800;tn=b
Here is the google cache. Check out some of the links. ;-)
http://72.14.209.104/search?q=cache:Jk9N2YcwVaYJ:profiles.yahoo.com/cappadonna21xxx+&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1
",... and finally that the Court Order the District Attorney to stop stalling and expeditiously provide full discovery the the defense."
Ya think?
I think it is a motion to ask the Federal courts to dismiss the charges when they have not gotten a speedy trial. I am not sure at what point that is, but some attorneys around here have said some number of months?
You and I are thinking alike. I think that this motion is part of a paper trail that might lead to a federal case (due process violations) and/or a civil suit.
The defense attorneys have asked for an expedited process in two hearings. Now the request has been reduced to a writing. I like it! (Don't forget. They had to ask for a record of the proceeding.)
Okaay. I've had a beer tonight, soooo I'm not following your questions.
Don't you remember in the first setting when the defense attorneys asked for a record to be made? They were asking for a court reporter to transcribe the proceedings. There was some indication that that's not usually done during these administrative hearings.
The defense attorneys are holding the court to its word. And yes, a ruling remains a ruling even after the judge is switched. (All these judges! Once a case is transferred to the circuit court up here, it stays with one judge. And we have a preliminary hearing -- you know, with neat stuff like probable cause. It's so different down there! They haven't even been arraigned yet.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.