1 posted on
07/20/2006 12:19:52 PM PDT by
ShadowAce
To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Bush2000; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; ...
2 posted on
07/20/2006 12:20:08 PM PDT by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
I see that, according to the
Inquirer, the French Defence Department rejects OpenOffice, claiming that it is not secure enough. You would think they would have deferred in case open source developers could have addressed the issues in a timely manner.
3 posted on
07/20/2006 12:34:49 PM PDT by
rit
To: ShadowAce
I actually had high hopes when MS announced this release. Oh well, MS is back to its old tricks I guess.
To: ShadowAce
No surprise here. This has been the MS corporate line since Office 97; use our stuff or be left out in the cold. Once upon a time, MS sold companies on Windows NT on the idea that it would play nice with their existing Unix and Novell servers. Now their attitude is "use ALL of our stuff, or jump through hoops". Active Directory is a picture-perfect example. Though LDAP is part of AD's makeup, try getting AD to work with another LDAP server out of the box...
7 posted on
07/20/2006 9:45:19 PM PDT by
DesScorp
To: ShadowAce
Of course, the assumption here is that anyone owns MS Word 2007 to begin with. I know few people who use anything more current than 2000.
OpenOffice does seem a little slow, though. I haven't crossed over there yet. But Firefox is solid.
8 posted on
07/24/2006 12:00:52 AM PDT by
LibertarianInExile
('Is' and 'amnesty' both have clear, plain meanings. Are Billy Jeff, Pence, McQueeg & Bush related?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson