Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feds stonewalling on 'super-state' plan?[Agency fails to respond to FOIA request on NAU]
WorldNet Daily ^ | July 19, 2006 | Not Cited

Posted on 07/19/2006 6:04:00 AM PDT by conservativecorner

The U.S. Department of Commerce appears to be stonewalling a Freedom of Information Act request to obtain complete disclosure of a congressionally unauthorized plan to implement a trilateral agreement with Mexico and Canada that apparently could lead to a North American union.

The plan is being implemented through an office within the Department of Commerce as the "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America," under the direction of Geri Word, who is listed as working in the department's North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, office.

As WorldNetDaily previously reported, the White House has established executive branch working groups documented on the Commerce website SPP.gov. The Security and Prosperity Partnership, or SPP, was issued as a joint press statement by President Bush, Mexican President Vincente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco, Texas, on March 23, 2005.

Commerce has missed a statutory requirement to respond to the FOIA request, filed by author Jerome R. Corsi, within 20 businesses days.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: buyalcoa; cusepookymusic; icecreammandrake; notthiscrapagain; theboogeyman; wnd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 07/19/2006 6:04:05 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

How does this end up in chat?


2 posted on 07/19/2006 6:22:20 AM PDT by Sybeck1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

Good question.


3 posted on 07/19/2006 6:47:12 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

I asked in any case. Commerce is outside the law under FOIA, and it's not news? LOL! Unbelievable is all I can say. No one says you have to agree with the FOIA request, but you ought to at least be able to ask the question, and when they refuse to answer it's NEWS!


4 posted on 07/19/2006 6:55:24 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

Conspiracy theories are not news, thus they are chatted. Factual news concerning conspiracy theories are therefore also chatted.


5 posted on 07/19/2006 6:57:55 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1
The same thing was done when illegal immigration first became an issue, and when Human Events gave credence to the NAU, they did the same thing with them even though you will see Human Events on the Front Page of the site.
6 posted on 07/19/2006 7:00:46 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Conspiracy theories? I'm reporting on the Commerce Dept. flipping a finger at Americans who have a right to the information under the FOIA. This is a fact, and not conspiracy.


7 posted on 07/19/2006 7:03:14 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
"Factual news concerning conspiracy theories"

PRICELESS...LOL! I will say no more after this beauty because I don't know how to argue an oxymoron.

8 posted on 07/19/2006 7:10:55 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1; conservativecorner
>How does this end up in chat?

Ummm, because it's more
silly nutty lunacy
from WorldNutsDaily?

9 posted on 07/19/2006 7:13:37 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
>Conspiracy theories? I'm reporting . . .

Well, some reporting
is best done by making shapes
in local wheat fields . . .

10 posted on 07/19/2006 7:18:13 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss
Let us know when there's enough "Factual news" to satisfy some magic number for inclusion in NEWS/ACTIVISM. I don't agree with everything WND puts out by any stretch, but the Executive Branch is making agreements with other nations without Congressional oversight. It always makes me nervous, not saying anything is even there at this point, when one branch of Govt. thumbs it's nose at Americans. In any case, if anything is there, this site will not stop the information from being widely distributed across the Internet. Again, I'm not even saying I believe anything at this point, but can we not ask questions of our Govt.?
11 posted on 07/19/2006 7:21:02 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
>can we not ask questions of our Govt.?

Certainly, but if
you ask your questions like this
THEY see them better

from THEIR satellites
and will immediately
send out black copters

to hover over
your house and beam THEIR response
right into your brain.

12 posted on 07/19/2006 7:27:22 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss
I have the satisfaction of knowing that there is a movement in this country to stop the give away for illegal aliens and big business. I hope there is no truth to these articles, but if so, we will deal with it as we did Meirs and the Shamnesty Plan. As Mr. Sowell said so well last week, "People Power".
13 posted on 07/19/2006 7:28:43 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss

I notice bs in your moniker. Now I know where it comes from. Have a great day.


14 posted on 07/19/2006 7:33:15 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
>we will deal with it as we did Meirs


15 posted on 07/19/2006 7:35:58 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss

I alomost forgot to include this because I'm your's so worried about crop circles that you don't do much reading.

Moniker
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
A moniker (or "monicker") is a pseudonym, or cognomen, which one gives to oneself. The meaning is distinct from nickname, in that a nickname is generally given to one by another, and not chosen for oneself.

(as slang "moniker" can mean simply "name")

Typically, this title is used as a professional name, instead of the person's given name for works of art, music, books, or performances.

Monikers can also name groups of people, but typically the name is creative and not descriptive.

Also commonly used on internet message boards.

[edit]
Monicker in Clowning
The word "monicker" or more rarely, "monikker" (among clowns, most often intentionally misspelled, with a 'c') in accordance with clown tradition that some words are inherently funny (and hence to be preferred over 'unfunny' words) has been widely embraced by the "clown world" as equivalent to a stage name or pseudonym. A monicker is considered by a professional clown to be sacrosanct by the traditional code of non-infringement. The monicker is considered to be an attribute of the character of the clown and not of the performer. Monicker, in clown usage, can generally be considered synonymous with the terms "clown name" and "Professional name". In declining use, it may mean a clown performer's personal nickname, (eg. "Joseph Grimaldi's monicker was Joey.") rather than the name of the performer's clown.


16 posted on 07/19/2006 7:36:58 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

LOL, owned!


17 posted on 07/19/2006 7:44:56 AM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
>The monicker is considered to be an attribute of the character of the clown and not of the performer. Monicker, in clown usage, can generally be considered synonymous with the terms "clown name" and "Professional name". In declining use . . .


18 posted on 07/19/2006 7:48:15 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII

19 posted on 07/19/2006 7:49:42 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
I'm reporting on the Commerce Dept. flipping a finger at Americans who have a right to the information under the FOIA. This is a fact, and not conspiracy.

When did Prof. Corsi file his FOIA request? Last week?

20 posted on 07/19/2006 7:51:46 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson