Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Godebert

> Is that why the north suffered more combat casualties than the South?.

No.

> We have God and all the guns anyway.

So that's why y'all lost? Must be a lesser God and some pretty crappy guns you have down there.

> What do you blue zone socialists ...

Since when is Utah a "blue zone?"


49 posted on 07/18/2006 2:16:00 PM PDT by orionblamblam (I'm interested in science and preventing its corruption, so here I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: orionblamblam
"Since when is Utah a "blue zone?"

Your family was in Utah before the War? I assume you or your family have roots either in the north or The South. Which is it? Or do you even know?

50 posted on 07/18/2006 2:31:07 PM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: orionblamblam
Since when is Utah a "blue zone?"

Utah wasn't a state in the Civil War, as it was admitted in 1896.

121 posted on 07/20/2006 12:29:07 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: orionblamblam
> Is that why the north suffered more combat casualties than the South?.

No.

Sorry, you're wrong. The north did lose more men than the south. Northern casualties: Battle deaths: 110,070; Disease, etc.: 250,152; Total 360,222. Southern casualties: Battle deaths: 94,000; Disease, etc.: 164,000; Total 258,000.

122 posted on 07/20/2006 12:31:49 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson