Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
...they rebelled and adopted a constitution that protected slavery expansion and slave imports in a way the Corwin amendment could never do.

True, but it would have been without great risk.
199 posted on 07/24/2006 7:41:51 AM PDT by smug (Tanstaafl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]


To: smug
True, but it would have been without great risk.

Again, why accept half a loaf when you've claimed the whole loaf for yourself? In the eyes of the southern leadership the greatest threat to them was limitations on the expansion of slavery, for with every new free state there was a new pair of anti-slavery senators. And as the free states grew the disproportionately large number of southern congressmen became less and less influential. That was the fear, not an end to slavery. That was the goal of the Republican party, containment and limitation of slavery and not ending it where it was. They knew that they could never accomplish that so long as the slave states held together.

200 posted on 07/24/2006 8:18:01 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson