Skip to comments.
Red China Opens NAFTA Ports in Mexico
Human Events Online ^
| Jul 18, 2006
| Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on 07/18/2006 8:42:32 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-128 next last
To: stephenjohnbanker
61
posted on
07/18/2006 10:10:17 AM PDT
by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
To: blackie
Just fine, blackie. And you?
62
posted on
07/18/2006 10:16:11 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Taglines for sale or rent. Good "one liners", 50 cents.)
To: sonyapeking
"He is just doing what he has to do to confront those countries who are hostile to it..."
And those countrie are??
63
posted on
07/18/2006 10:17:23 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Taglines for sale or rent. Good "one liners", 50 cents.)
To: stephenjohnbanker
well,for your information,the primary one of "those" is your beloved motherland, the great United States of America...
To: sonyapeking
We don't have a motherland, fatherland or homeland. We have a nation.
65
posted on
07/18/2006 10:25:13 AM PDT
by
hedgetrimmer
("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: 1rudeboy
Wow -- three freaking months!
66
posted on
07/18/2006 10:27:52 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
(Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
To: hedgetrimmer
whatever you call...same thing...
To: sonyapeking
I can see that your government has got you housetrained.
I wish you good luck only as a matter of form.
68
posted on
07/18/2006 10:29:17 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Taglines for sale or rent. Good "one liners", 50 cents.)
To: sonyapeking
69
posted on
07/18/2006 10:31:51 AM PDT
by
monkeywrench
(Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
To: stephenjohnbanker; darkwing104
sonyapeking since June 5th 2006.
70
posted on
07/18/2006 10:32:31 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Taglines for sale or rent. Good "one liners", 50 cents.)
To: monkeywrench
71
posted on
07/18/2006 10:34:50 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Taglines for sale or rent. Good "one liners", 50 cents.)
To: Alberta's Child
What this article doesn't mention is that much of this trans-Pacific trade activity in Mexico is being driven by severe capacity constraints at West Coast ports here in the U.S. (particularly Los Angeles/Long Beach). The Port of Oakland seems somewhat less than busy lately - but that might be those $100+/hour Longshoreman's Union members pricing themselves out of the market. I think that's the real driving force behind the Mexican ports idea. Seattle is much closer to China.
72
posted on
07/18/2006 10:36:52 AM PDT
by
Mr. Jeeves
("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
To: sonyapeking
whatever you call...same thing
Maybe in your language, but here, words do mean things.
73
posted on
07/18/2006 10:37:23 AM PDT
by
hedgetrimmer
("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: Mr. Jeeves
I think the bigger problem in Oakland and Seattle is that the rail lines to the east (I think these are mainly BNSF tracks) can't process intermodal trains as well as the UP/SP system out of LA.
74
posted on
07/18/2006 10:39:53 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
(Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
To: Alberta's Child
That's true - the rail system out of Oakland is weak. They were talking about building a big new rail corridor through the East Bay hills a while back, but you can imagine how local environmentalists reacted to that. ;)
75
posted on
07/18/2006 10:43:59 AM PDT
by
Mr. Jeeves
("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
To: Mr. Jeeves
Then Oakland has the same problem on the west coast that Baltimore has on the east coast . . . limited inland rail distribution capability.
This "short-sea shipping" concept is starting to get some legs here on the east coast to help alleviate some north-south congestion, but that won't help much for inland moves.
76
posted on
07/18/2006 11:02:35 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
(Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
To: hedgetrimmer; Czar; nicmarlo; texastoo; Kenny Bunk; EternalVigilance; jer33 3; janetgreen; ...
Reposted - Please take the time to read the whole article.
Excerpt - Full article: Made In China
Preface - Made In China.
Fateful decisions made by Chinas leaders, limiting births to mostly males and forbidding farmers to tap shrinking reservoirs diverted to smog-choked cities could lead to internal strife and foreign conquest as this economic powerhouse reaches the limits of explosive growth. But US consumers continue to fund Chinas military modernization, even as they erode their own economy and employment at home. Even worse, Wal-Mart shoppers are supporting forced labor camps where the healthiest inmates are executed for organ harvesting. Wal-Mart also buys heavily from slave labor manufacturing zones, where women workers are typically paid 3 cents an hour or less for 70 to 90-hour work weeks. See smuggled photos here. And please dont buy any products Made In China.
77
posted on
07/18/2006 11:37:59 AM PDT
by
Smartass
("In God We Trust" - "An informed and knowledgeably citizen is the best defense against tyranny")
To: hedgetrimmer; Czar; nicmarlo; texastoo; Kenny Bunk; EternalVigilance; jer33 3; janetgreen; ...
|
|
|
Welcome to Trade Ticker - the web's only up-to-the-second counter for the U.S. Trade Deficit. |
$414,245,191,418.97
|
What does this number actually mean? The number above represents the U.S. trade deficit, up until this second, for the year 2006. A trade deficit is a calculation of the difference between the goods and services Americans sell to foreigners and the goods and services that Americans purchase from foreigners. A trade deficit with one country or in one year is not necessarily worrisome, and according to standard economic theory, will correct itself over time. But the theory has been proved wrong over the last 30 years as the United States has run consistent and increasing trade deficits. The enormous size of the trade deficits over the last several years raises the possibility of a severe international economic crisis should foreigners begin to dump the dollars they hold in world currency markets. The trade deficit is calculated on an annual basis, so the number above was $0.00 on January 1st, 2006.
How is it calculated? The figures for each month's trade deficit are published to the general public approximately two months after the last day of the month. For example, the final trade deficit for January 2001 was published in March 2001. The Trade Ticker records the monthly trade deficit when it is published, and calculates the number above, to the nearest second. The running total for the year is calculated, then the average increment per second is added for every second since the release of the latest figures.
The number looks like a lot of money, but what does it mean for me? Thousands of U.S. layoffs occur every week. You only have to look at AmericanEconomicAlert.org's news section to see the number of US jobs that are being cut across a wide range of industries. A high percentage of these layoffs are as a direct result of competition from foreign companies. Eventually, as more and more money leaves the U.S., our businesses will be powerless to prevent further such activity.
|
|
|
|
78
posted on
07/18/2006 11:50:35 AM PDT
by
Smartass
("In God We Trust" - "An informed and knowledgeably citizen is the best defense against tyranny")
To: Smartass
79
posted on
07/18/2006 12:03:56 PM PDT
by
hedgetrimmer
("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: Smartass
War with the USA is inevitable, Red Chinas Defense Minister, Chi Haotian told Hong Kong's Cheng Ming newspaper. "We cannot avoid it," he said. "Chinese armed forces must control the initiative in this war." According to right-wing Rand researchers, China's military is narrowing its technology gap with the US armed forces, using US technology transfers to prepare for a future war with the US. Certainly they can avoid war; why is it inevitable?
80
posted on
07/18/2006 12:20:54 PM PDT
by
LucyT
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-128 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson